We free the SAP data your AI can't reach.

We use AI with intent.

Both sides of AI. On purpose.

AI is on every homepage now. We didn't ship it as a badge — we built it where it changes the work, and so it keeps pace as AI moves.

AI changes weekly. Rebuilding a product doesn't.

In most software, an AI feature is hardcoded — wired to one model, one set of behaviors, frozen the day it ships. When the models move, the product falls behind until someone re-engineers it.

DataXover is built the other way. The rules the AI follows aren't buried in code — they're written, versioned documents the platform reads at the moment it runs. Change the document, and the behavior changes. No rebuild. No release. No redeploy. Every revision is versioned, every run records the version it ran under, and nothing the AI produces applies itself.

So when AI moves — a new model, a sharper way to do something — the platform keeps pace by publishing a revision, in minutes. Those rules are written per model, so it meets whatever model you run where it actually is. And they get better over time — refined from real use and testing, not frozen at launch.

Most AI features
DataXover's AI
Hardcoded to one model
Written rules, tuned per model
Frozen the day they ship
Revised in minutes — no rebuild
Fall behind as models change
Keep pace as models change
A badge on the box
Added only where it changes the work

Most AI features are a snapshot. This one is designed to move as fast as the field it depends on.

Enterprises don't fear AI that's occasionally wrong.

They fear AI that's confidently wrong.

Three owned inputs. The AI composes them. You decide.

The reason this can be trusted against a live system isn't a promise — it's structure. Every run stands on three inputs, and each has a clear owner. The AI reasons across all three and authors none of them.

Owned by you
Intent
You declare what you're trying to do, in plain words. Nothing happens that you didn't ask for.
Owned by the system
Current State
The facts come straight from your system of record — the tables, fields, and state exactly as they are. The model is handed them; it never makes them up.
Owned by DataXover
Thesis
The doctrine the AI reasons under — what's allowed, what isn't, and when to stop. Maintained, versioned, and tuned as AI moves.

You write the intent. Your system holds the truth. Our thesis sets the rules. The AI reasons within all three and authors none — you decide.

Built to refuse, not to guess.

That fear is the whole reason the thesis exists. It does everything it can to keep the model from filling a gap with a plausible assumption and presenting it as fact.

Laws

The thesis sets hard limits on what the AI is allowed to propose. A proposal outside them isn't a preference the platform weighs — it's simply wrong, and it doesn't get applied. The rules are explicit, not implied. The platform validates every reply against its contract before it can even be imported — and nothing applies without a person.

Refusal

When the objective is unclear, or depends on something that isn't actually there, the AI doesn't paper over it. It refuses — and tells you exactly what's missing. It's built not to invent intent from what it happens to see; reinterpreting your goal to make it fit is treated as a failure, not a convenience.

It reasons over what your system actually contains and cites what it read. Where it can't stand on cited ground, it stops and says so. That's the design — not a disclaimer — and a person is always the one who decides.

Built to refuse — rather than be confidently wrong.

Two more guardrails, by design. The AI layer is optional: data integration, B2B distribution, and compliance all run with it switched off. And the model is your choice — bring your own, from the providers we support, running on your own account.

One way of working, wherever the work used to require an expert.

Across the platform, the same shape repeats. You state your intent in plain words. The platform proposes a draft, or surfaces what you need to see. You review it and decide. And where it produced something, it checks that against your real data before anything is used.

AI proposes or clarifies. You decide. The system verifies.

Same capability. A different person can now reach it.

For the compliance officer
Before
Linking compliance coverage to a data flow meant knowing which SAP tables and fields that flow touches — knowledge that lives with the SAP team, not the compliance office.
With AI
When a profile reaches the compliance queue, the platform helps you understand what's actually in it — the data it moves, the tables and fields it touches, where it's headed. That clarity is what lets you link the right coverage. The platform never picks the coverage for you; it makes sure you can see clearly what you're covering.
For the administrator
Before
Keeping a finger on the pulse meant working through log screens and dashboards — hoping you were looking at the right one at the right time.
With AI
Ask: "summarize system health over the last 24 hours, and flag anything that needs immediate attention." Get a direct answer, with the detail behind it a click away.
For the analyst building an extraction
Before
Building a profile meant wiring tables and relationships correctly across SAP's data model — expert work, and easy to get subtly wrong.
With AI
Describe the dataset you need. The platform proposes the configuration; you confirm it; and it verifies the result against your real data before anything is used.

AI proposes. People decide. The system verifies.

Nothing the AI produces changes your system on its own. Every proposal lands as a draft for a person to review and commit — active state moves only on a human decision, through the platform's ordinary controls.

And every proposal is checked against your live data. It's a starting point the platform tests, not an answer taken on faith. The AI makes the platform reachable; it never makes the platform's decisions.

Reachable to more people. Still under human control.

One approach, across the platform.

Wherever the work has been expert-only — compliance, configuration, monitoring — the same pattern brings it within reach, without giving up control of what actually happens. And the other side of the hero holds too: the SAP data your own AI has been starved of flows to it through DataXover, on your models, on your account.